They Aren't Military

I reprint this coming from a family of police officers. Their work is definitely hard and not for everyone. And they certainly don't deal with people who have everything going right in their lives, but their work isn't so much that it trumps everything else going on. There are a lot of lousy cops out there. The vast majority of them, however, are upstanding people who want nothing in return and do their job very well. There's also a lot of lousy politicians, bloggers and preachers. At the end of the day it all equals out. So I too think JS hits police power versus necessity right on the head.

Police work is not that dangerous compared to, say, driving a cab. Firefighters have a far more physically dangerous job. However, cops have a heroic job: much harder in so many ways than firefighting. Firefighters are almost never in a morally ambiguous zone and almost always are in the business of making people feel good. Cops handle humans at their worst.

This distinction matters. When cops stress the (low) physical danger of their job, they're setting themselves up to be military. That's no good for the country. Large cities probably need a SWAT team, but that is not the model for most police work. Collateral damage is simply not acceptable for police. It also leads to police cowardice. A lot of civilian damage is justified by the military concept: "force protection." Highly-armed and highly-trained cops use a lot more violence against citizens than a court would deem acceptable if one citizen used it against another.

Cops do not stress the (high) psychological danger of their job, because that makes them social workers with guns, able to handle difficult people with aplomb and an absolute minimum of violence, either threatened or applied. And that's what they should be.

So don't play into fascist stereotypes of manly danger. Police work is hard, dirty, and noble. But it is not particularly dangerous. And it shouldn't be viewed that way.