Think Progress has a nifty timeline of events leading up to the killing of Osama bin Laden. The whole thing is incomplete, however.
Why start with Clinton? I mean I'm glad to see TP taking the debate back to Clinton and not pretending like George W. Bush was the first president to target bin Laden. But the facts clearly show had it not been for President Reagan arming, funding and supplying intelligence to bin Laden we wouldn't have had an enemy to track and kill in the first place.
Do you really think Republicans would not be talking about Clinton creating bin Laden had he did what Reagan did??? When we complain about Democrats having a terrible messaging problem, this is what we mean. It's really a totally lost fact if we don't take this back to Reagan.
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
When one man was contained and powerless outside his own country, he went after him and brought vengeance along for the ride. This is his story as only history can tell it.
Site Sponsors
0 comments :
Post a Comment