What possibly has President Obama done to limit people's rights to bear arms? I've been asking myself that all day. Just like with the tea baggers, the attendees at today's gun march have no clue what they are protesting. In every logical sense, there is nothing to even protest. Wouldn't the very fact that they are allowed to protest while armed be enough to prove that their rights haven't been trampled upon?
Just to get a little deeper, the president's only official action in regards to the 2nd Amendment was when he signed a federal law expanding gun owner's rights. Yes, that's right. President Obama actually signed the bill that allowed the protesters to have their march-- a bill the NRA fully supported. This is comparable to school teachers protesting higher wages. Why can't they just admit their protests are because they are mad they lost an election?
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
When one man was contained and powerless outside his own country, he went after him and brought vengeance along for the ride. This is his story as only history can tell it.
Site Sponsors
